A Perspective from Twelve Years of Public Service
As our community continues to grow, residents naturally have questions about development, water resources, transportation, mining, public spending, and the Town's long-term plans. Healthy discussion is an important part of representative government, and it demonstrates how much people care about the future of Sahuarita.
Having served eight years on the Town of Sahuarita Planning and Zoning Commission—including my final two years as Chairman—and four years on the Pima County Board of Adjustment, I have had the privilege of participating in many public hearings involving complex and often controversial issues.
I'd like to share some perspective on how local government works and why many decisions are more complex than they may appear.
One of the most common misconceptions is that elected officials or volunteer commissioners simply vote according to personal preference or public opinion.
In reality, that is not how Arizona's land use process works.
Members of Planning and Zoning Commissions and Boards of Adjustment serve in a quasi-judicial capacity. We have a legal obligation to approach every public hearing with an open mind. We cannot legally enter a hearing having already decided the outcome.
Only after hearing all of the evidence do commissioners deliberate before making a recommendation or decision. This process protects everyone equally—residents, businesses, property owners, and taxpayers.
Another misconception is that the Planning and Zoning Commission makes the final decision.
In most zoning matters, it does not.
The Commission conducts the public hearing, reviews the evidence, and forwards a recommendation to the Town Council. The Town Council then conducts its own public hearing before making the final decision.
One project that generated significant public interest involved Vulcan Materials and the possibility of an asphalt plant.
I had the privilege of serving as Chairman of the Planning and Zoning Commission during that process.
Like every case before the Commission, our responsibility was to evaluate the application based solely on the evidence presented during the public hearing. We could not legally approve or deny a request based on personal opinions or public sentiment.
Fortunately, before the process concluded, the Mayor and Town Council negotiated an agreement with Vulcan under which the company agreed to withdraw its request and not pursue an asphalt plant at that location.
The answer is that local governments must follow the law.
Private property owners have constitutional and statutory rights. If a municipality ignores its own ordinances or denies an application without a lawful basis supported by the facts, taxpayers can ultimately bear the financial burden through costly litigation.
That is precisely why public hearings exist. They ensure decisions are based upon evidence, adopted policies, applicable law, and public testimony—not emotion, assumptions, or politics.
Proposition 420 concerns the Town's updated General Plan.
Arizona law requires municipalities to periodically update their General Plan every ten years. The purpose is to evaluate how the community has changed, gather public input, assess future needs, and refine the community's long-term vision.
If voters do not approve the updated General Plan, the current plan remains in effect while the Town must undertake another General Plan update process to satisfy state requirements.
The General Plan does not change zoning.
Future zoning decisions still occur independently through public notice, Planning and Zoning Commission review, citizen input, and Town Council action.
Questions are sometimes raised about the Town's membership in the League of Arizona Cities and Towns and the associated membership dues.
The League is a statewide organization whose members include Arizona's incorporated cities and towns. It provides legal resources, legislative analysis, professional training, technical assistance, and opportunities for municipalities to collaborate on issues affecting local government.
Residents may have differing opinions regarding the value of those dues. Those are legitimate policy discussions. However, it is helpful to understand what the membership provides before evaluating a single budget item in isolation.
Whether serving as an elected official, volunteer commissioner, or Town staff member, public service is often far more complex than it appears from the outside.
Those serving our community spend countless hours reviewing reports, studying regulations, attending meetings, listening to residents, asking difficult questions, and balancing competing interests.
For anyone considering running for public office someday, I strongly encourage first serving on one of the Town's boards or commissions or on a county advisory board.
These volunteer positions provide invaluable experience in Arizona's Open Meeting Law, due process, ethics, land-use regulations, public hearings, and the responsibilities that come with making decisions on behalf of an entire community.
Democracy works best when citizens ask questions, verify information from reliable sources, attend public meetings, review public records, and consider the facts before reaching conclusions.
The more we understand those processes, the better equipped we are to evaluate issues, participate constructively, and make informed decisions as voters.
My hope is that we continue approaching community discussions with respect, curiosity, and a willingness to listen to one another.
An informed and engaged community is one of Sahuarita's greatest strengths, and together we can continue building a town that reflects the values and aspirations of the people who proudly call it home.
John Backer
Former Chairman, Town of Sahuarita Planning & Zoning Commission
8 years of service
Former Member, Pima County Board of Adjustment
4 years of service